Fundraising is a
crucial aspect for any cause but especially when it comes to politics.
Political campaigns require millions of dollars to run. Failing to
secure necessary funds within the time constraints can jeopardize a
politician’s campaign and cause him the race. Political fundraising efforts are in full swing for the upcoming year of 2012, and many wonder whether the candidates will be able to make it.
Consider these stats – it costs over $1 million per candidate to fund
a congressional campaign while senate campaigns cost over $4 million on
average. Senators require an average $10,000 per week of campaign
funding during re-elections. In 2007, presidential campaigns totaled
$481.2 million – more than the total amount of all campaigns between
1976 and 2000. These numbers are overwhelming and spur the unceasing
need for additional political fundraising.
This year political fundraising is at an all time low. In fact, a
study shows that progress is far behind where it was for fundraising in
2007 for the last presidential election. Currently, Mitt Romney – the
former governor of Massachusetts – leads among all the candidates with
$18 million already raised. Rick Perry, governor of Texas, had collected
$10 million as of the end of the third fundraising quarter. Others,
like Michelle Bachmann are being less open with the progress of their
fundraising.
The funds that fuel political campaigns are usually provided by
political action committees or private parties willing to donate to a
candidate’s cause. However, congressional candidates are limited to a
maximum of $5,000 from any one political action committee. This creates
the need to find other methods of fueling campaigns.
With the steady decline of the economy, politicians have come to
terms with the fact that they will have to make do with less than their
presidential predecessors. Campaign committees are scrambling to come up
with innovative political fundraising ideas that will help them make
ends meet.
There are various industries that generally donate to political
fundraising. These include lawyers and law firms, the retired,
securities & investments, real estate, miscellaneous businesses,
business services, miscellaneous finance, health professionals,
education, and media (TV/music/movies). Lawyers and firms tend to
contribute the majority of these funds with media accounting for the
lowest amount. 2012 candidates are sure to deplete these sources as
completely as possible.
The Democrats are currently leading in funds raised but the
Republicans are predicted to catch up quickly. This mad race to find
sources for political fundraising threatens to violate the principle of
equality. When a congressional candidate accepts money from private
sources (or what are referred to as special interests) it often
influences him and his political decisions in office. This effect
threatens the balance of “one man, one vote” – a far more serious issue
than sufficient funding.
No comments:
Post a Comment